|
Post by pattydangles on Aug 18, 2019 14:03:49 GMT -5
N.E agrees to trade TE O.J Howard to Buffalo for QB Sam Darnold, TE David NJoku and W.R Christian Kirk
|
|
|
Post by Pat on Aug 18, 2019 14:24:13 GMT -5
Confirmed
|
|
jojoj9
Trade Reviewer
Posts: 438
|
Post by jojoj9 on Aug 20, 2019 14:47:34 GMT -5
Im sorry but there is no way to accept this the way it is! Buffaloe is giving up two clear cut 2 starters and arguably WR2 for a TE who will more then likely start this season but is still slated to split time. This a Veto for me but I would love to hear more of the other reviewers...
|
|
|
Post by Pat on Aug 20, 2019 19:29:45 GMT -5
Im sorry but there is no way to accept this the way it is! Buffaloe is giving up two clear cut 2 starters and arguably WR2 for a TE who will more then likely start this season but is still slated to split time. This a Veto for me but I would love to hear more of the other reviewers... How about - Njoku + Darnold for Howard?
|
|
jojoj9
Trade Reviewer
Posts: 438
|
Post by jojoj9 on Aug 21, 2019 2:14:48 GMT -5
Would be a huge win for N.E. (+50) but not a veto in my book
|
|
modameru
Fantrax Manager
The Pack is ready to start...
Posts: 2,478
|
Post by modameru on Aug 21, 2019 5:18:23 GMT -5
Im sorry but there is no way to accept this the way it is! Buffaloe is giving up two clear cut 2 starters and arguably WR2 for a TE who will more then likely start this season but is still slated to split time. This a Veto for me but I would love to hear more of the other reviewers... I am not a reviewer - however, here are my 5 cents: I have the impression, BUF simply wants to make room on its roster without having to do buy outs. that its why it gives away the players in a trade. smart move and since he is 100% aware of what he is doing, I am ok with it. It is not hurting the league much. On paper on first glance he is loosing, yes, but with the assumed context, he is not loosing, but winning. A trade is never a trade of players solely...
|
|
|
Post by Pat on Aug 21, 2019 6:55:50 GMT -5
Would be a huge win for N.E. (+50) but not a veto in my book Discussion it w NE
|
|
jojoj9
Trade Reviewer
Posts: 438
|
Post by jojoj9 on Aug 21, 2019 16:07:40 GMT -5
Im sorry but there is no way to accept this the way it is! Buffaloe is giving up two clear cut 2 starters and arguably WR2 for a TE who will more then likely start this season but is still slated to split time. This a Veto for me but I would love to hear more of the other reviewers... I am not a reviewer - however, here are my 5 cents: I have the impression, BUF simply wants to make room on its roster without having to do buy outs. that its why it gives away the players in a trade. smart move and since he is 100% aware of what he is doing, I am ok with it. It is not hurting the league much. On paper on first glance he is loosing, yes, but with the assumed context, he is not loosing, but winning. A trade is never a trade of players solely... And here I thought he only did it Bc he thought OJ Howard who catches passes from Finger Licking Famous Jameis would be the man in these Streets... **sarcasm off** Listen here Jack... he is basically making room and Cutting players without Fees or Penalties... explain to me again how that is fair to the rest of the league?! As I stated b4 i looked at the entire detail of the trade and contracts are a small part of my initial rebuttal... But if someone trades 3 possible starters for 1 possible starter (regardless of contract details) then that ONE better be a damn stud for me to be like ok I can see why he did that... which obviously isn’t the case here...
|
|
|
Post by pattydangles on Aug 23, 2019 16:20:23 GMT -5
Hey gentleman just reading this now, I wanted Sam darnold for a backup he was charging me too much draft pick wise as New York's not gonna be good for a while. Njoku may get TDs but not yards with that run and pass options, O.J is going to have Monster years ahead with DeSean and Humphries gone, and I'm 4 deep there so Kirk was added. Nothing malicious, Kirk's done nothing either and on a rebuilding team who just signed Crabtree to boot.
|
|